Santikos Cine-opsis

2010 Oscar Predictions (I’m not too late, right?!?)

by JT Street on Mar.07, 2010, under JT's movie musings

Ok…without any further ado (there’s no time for much ado about anything anyway!) here are my sentimental picks for this year’s Oscars!  (Just to show how wrong my gut can be!)  And be sure to check out my recap later on ( which will be posted whenever the Oscars are over and I decide to do a recap!)

Legend (XXXXXX!!!!) - JT’s pick!

Performance by an actor in a leading role

  • Jeff Bridges in “Crazy Heart” (Fox Searchlight)
  • George Clooney in “Up in the Air” (Paramount in association with Cold Spring Pictures and DW Studios)
  • Colin Firth in “A Single Man” (The Weinstein Company)
  • Morgan Freeman in “Invictus” (Warner Bros.)
  • Jeremy Renner in “The Hurt Locker” (Summit Entertainment)   XXXXXX!!!!

Performance by an actor in a supporting role

  • Matt Damon in “Invictus” (Warner Bros.)
  • Woody Harrelson in “The Messenger” (Oscilloscope Laboratories)
  • Christopher Plummer in “The Last Station” (Sony Pictures Classics)
  • Stanley Tucci in “The Lovely Bones” (DreamWorks in association with Film4, Distributed by Paramount)
  • Christoph Waltz in “Inglourious Basterds” (The Weinstein Company) XXXXXX!!!!

Performance by an actress in a leading role

  • Sandra Bullock in “The Blind Side” (Warner Bros.)
  • Helen Mirren in “The Last Station” (Sony Pictures Classics)
  • Carey Mulligan in “An Education” (Sony Pictures Classics)
  • Gabourey Sidibe in “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” (Lionsgate) XXXXXX!!!!
  • Meryl Streep in “Julie & Julia” (Sony Pictures Releasing)

Performance by an actress in a supporting role

  • Penélope Cruz in “Nine” (The Weinstein Company)
  • Vera Farmiga in “Up in the Air” (Paramount in association with Cold Spring Pictures and DW Studios)
  • Maggie Gyllenhaal in “Crazy Heart” (Fox Searchlight)
  • Anna Kendrick in “Up in the Air” (Paramount in association with Cold Spring Pictures and DW Studios)
  • Mo’Nique in “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” (Lionsgate) XXXXXX!!!!

Best animated feature film of the year

  • “Coraline” (Focus Features) Henry Selick
  • “Fantastic Mr. Fox” (20th Century Fox) Wes Anderson
  • “The Princess and the Frog” (Walt Disney) John Musker and Ron Clements
  • “The Secret of Kells” (GKIDS) Tomm Moore
  • “Up” (Walt Disney) Pete Docter XXXXXX!!!!

Achievement in art direction

  • “Avatar” (20th Century Fox) Art Direction: Rick Carter and Robert Stromberg XXXXXX!!!!
    Set Decoration: Kim Sinclair
  • “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” (Sony Pictures Classics) Art Direction: Dave Warren and Anastasia Masaro
    Set Decoration: Caroline Smith
  • “Nine” (The Weinstein Company) Art Direction: John Myhre
    Set Decoration: Gordon Sim
  • “Sherlock Holmes” (Warner Bros.) Art Direction: Sarah Greenwood
    Set Decoration: Katie Spencer
  • “The Young Victoria” (Apparition) Art Direction: Patrice Vermette
    Set Decoration: Maggie Gray

Achievement in cinematography

  • “Avatar” (20th Century Fox) Mauro Fiore
  • “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince” (Warner Bros.) Bruno Delbonnel
  • “The Hurt Locker” (Summit Entertainment) Barry Ackroyd XXXXXX!!!!
  • “Inglourious Basterds” (The Weinstein Company) Robert Richardson
  • “The White Ribbon” (Sony Pictures Classics) Christian Berger

Achievement in costume design (JT IS JUST GUESSING HERE!)

  • “Bright Star” (Apparition) Janet Patterson
  • “Coco before Chanel” (Sony Pictures Classics) Catherine Leterrier
  • “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” (Sony Pictures Classics) Monique Prudhomme
  • “Nine” (The Weinstein Company) Colleen Atwood
  • “The Young Victoria” (Apparition) Sandy Powell  XXXXXX!!!!

Achievement in directing

  • “Avatar” (20th Century Fox) James Cameron
  • “The Hurt Locker” (Summit Entertainment) Kathryn Bigelow XXXXXX!!!!
  • “Inglourious Basterds” (The Weinstein Company) Quentin Tarantino
  • “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” (Lionsgate) Lee Daniels
  • “Up in the Air” (Paramount in association with Cold Spring Pictures and DW Studios) Jason Reitman

Best documentary feature (JT IS JUST GUESSING HERE!)

  • “Burma VJ” (Oscilloscope Laboratories)
    A Magic Hour Films Production
    Anders Østergaard and Lise Lense-Møller
  • “The Cove” (Roadside Attractions)
    An Oceanic Preservation Society Production
    Nominees to be determined XXXXXX!!!!
  • “Food, Inc.” (Magnolia Pictures)
    A Robert Kenner Films Production
    Robert Kenner and Elise Pearlstein
  • “The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers”
    A Kovno Communications Production
    Judith Ehrlich and Rick Goldsmith
  • “Which Way Home”
    A Mr. Mudd Production
    Rebecca Cammisa

Best documentary short subject (JT IS JUST GUESSING HERE!)

  • “China’s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province”
    A Downtown Community Television Center Production
    Jon Alpert and Matthew O’Neill  XXXXXX!!!!
  • “The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner”
    A Just Media Production
    Daniel Junge and Henry Ansbacher
  • “The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant”
    A Community Media Production
    Steven Bognar and Julia Reichert
  • “Music by Prudence”
    An iThemba Production
    Roger Ross Williams and Elinor Burkett
  • “Rabbit à la Berlin” (Deckert Distribution)
    An MS Films Production
    Bartek Konopka and Anna Wydra

Achievement in film editing

  • “Avatar” (20th Century Fox) Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua and James Cameron
  • “District 9″ (Sony Pictures Releasing) Julian Clarke  XXXXXX!!!!
  • “The Hurt Locker” (Summit Entertainment) Bob Murawski and Chris Innis
  • “Inglourious Basterds” (The Weinstein Company) Sally Menke
  • “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” (Lionsgate) Joe Klotz

Best foreign language film of the year

  • “Ajami”(Kino International)
    An Inosan Production
    Israel
  • “El Secreto de Sus Ojos” (Sony Pictures Classics)
    A Haddock Films Production
    Argentina
  • “The Milk of Sorrow”
    A Wanda Visión/Oberon Cinematogràfica/Vela Production
    Peru
  • “Un Prophète” (Sony Pictures Classics)
    A Why Not/Page 114/Chic Films Production
    France
  • “The White Ribbon” (Sony Pictures Classics)
    An X Filme Creative Pool/Wega Film/Les Films du Losange/Lucky Red Production
    Germany  XXXXXX!!!!

Achievement in makeup

  • “Il Divo” (MPI Media Group through Music Box) Aldo Signoretti and Vittorio Sodano
  • “Star Trek” (Paramount and Spyglass Entertainment) Barney Burman, Mindy Hall and Joel Harlow  XXXXXX!!!!
  • “The Young Victoria” (Apparition) Jon Henry Gordon and Jenny Shircore

Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original score)

  • “Avatar” (20th Century Fox) James Horner
  • “Fantastic Mr. Fox” (20th Century Fox) Alexandre Desplat
  • “The Hurt Locker” (Summit Entertainment) Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders
  • “Sherlock Holmes” (Warner Bros.) Hans Zimmer  XXXXXX!!!!
  • “Up” (Walt Disney) Michael Giacchino

Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original song)

  • “Almost There” from “The Princess and the Frog” (Walt Disney) Music and Lyric by Randy Newman
  • “Down in New Orleans” from “The Princess and the Frog” (Walt Disney) Music and Lyric by Randy Newman
  • “Loin de Paname” from “Paris 36″ (Sony Pictures Classics) Music by Reinhardt Wagner
    Lyric by Frank Thomas
  • “Take It All” from “Nine” (The Weinstein Company) Music and Lyric by Maury Yeston
  • “The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)” from “Crazy Heart” (Fox Searchlight) Music and Lyric by Ryan Bingham and T Bone Burnett  XXXXXX!!!!

Best motion picture of the year

  • “Avatar” (20th Century Fox)
    A Lightstorm Entertainment Production
    James Cameron and Jon Landau, Producers
  • “The Blind Side” (Warner Bros.)
    An Alcon Entertainment Production
    Nominees to be determined
  • “District 9″ (Sony Pictures Releasing)
    A Block/Hanson Production
    Peter Jackson and Carolynne Cunningham, Producers
  • “An Education” (Sony Pictures Classics)
    A Finola Dwyer/Wildgaze Films Production
    Finola Dwyer and Amanda Posey, Producers
  • “The Hurt Locker” (Summit Entertainment)
    A Voltage Pictures Production
    Nominees to be determined  XXXXXX!!!!
  • “Inglourious Basterds” (The Weinstein Company)
    A Weinstein Company/Universal Pictures/A Band Apart/Zehnte Babelsberg Production
    Lawrence Bender, Producer
  • “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” (Lionsgate)
    A Lee Daniels Entertainment/Smokewood Entertainment Production
    Lee Daniels, Sarah Siegel-Magness and Gary Magness, Producers
  • “A Serious Man” (Focus Features)
    A Working Title Films Production
    Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, Producers
  • “Up” (Walt Disney)
    A Pixar Production
    Jonas Rivera, Producer
  • “Up in the Air” (Paramount in association with Cold Spring Pictures and DW Studios)
    A Montecito Picture Company Production
    Daniel Dubiecki, Ivan Reitman and Jason Reitman, Producers

Best animated short film  (JT IS JUST GUESSING HERE!)

  • “French Roast”
    A Pumpkin Factory/Bibo Films Production
    Fabrice O. Joubert
  • “Granny O’Grimm’s Sleeping Beauty” (Brown Bag Films)
    A Brown Bag Films Production
    Nicky Phelan and Darragh O’Connell
  • “The Lady and the Reaper (La Dama y la Muerte)”
    A Kandor Graphics and Green Moon Production
    Javier Recio Gracia  XXXXXX!!!!
  • “Logorama” (Autour de Minuit)
    An Autour de Minuit Production
    Nicolas Schmerkin
  • “A Matter of Loaf and Death” (Aardman Animations)
    An Aardman Animations Production
    Nick Park

Best live action short film (JT IS JUST GUESSING HERE!)

  • “The Door” (Network Ireland Television)
    An Octagon Films Production
    Juanita Wilson and James Flynn
  • “Instead of Abracadabra” (The Swedish Film Institute)
    A Directörn & Fabrikörn Production
    Patrik Eklund and Mathias Fjellström
  • “Kavi”
    A Gregg Helvey Production
    Gregg Helvey
  • “Miracle Fish” (Premium Films)
    A Druid Films Production
    Luke Doolan and Drew Bailey  XXXXXX!!!!
  • “The New Tenants”
    A Park Pictures and M & M Production
    Joachim Back and Tivi Magnusson

Achievement in sound editing

  • “Avatar” (20th Century Fox) Christopher Boyes and Gwendolyn Yates Whittle
  • “The Hurt Locker” (Summit Entertainment) Paul N.J. Ottosson  XXXXXX!!!!
  • “Inglourious Basterds” (The Weinstein Company) Wylie Stateman
  • “Star Trek” (Paramount and Spyglass Entertainment) Mark Stoeckinger and Alan Rankin
  • “Up” (Walt Disney) Michael Silvers and Tom Myers

Achievement in sound mixing

  • “Avatar” (20th Century Fox) Christopher Boyes, Gary Summers, Andy Nelson and Tony Johnson
  • “The Hurt Locker” (Summit Entertainment) Paul N.J. Ottosson and Ray Beckett  XXXXXX!!!!
  • “Inglourious Basterds” (The Weinstein Company) Michael Minkler, Tony Lamberti and Mark Ulano
  • “Star Trek” (Paramount and Spyglass Entertainment) Anna Behlmer, Andy Nelson and Peter J. Devlin
  • “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” (DreamWorks and Paramount in association with Hasbro, Distributed by Paramount) Greg P. Russell, Gary Summers and Geoffrey Patterson

Achievement in visual effects

  • “Avatar” (20th Century Fox) Joe Letteri, Stephen Rosenbaum, Richard Baneham and Andrew R. Jones
  • “District 9″ (Sony Pictures Releasing) Dan Kaufman, Peter Muyzers, Robert Habros and Matt Aitken  XXXXXX!!!!
  • “Star Trek” (Paramount and Spyglass Entertainment) Roger Guyett, Russell Earl, Paul Kavanagh and Burt Dalton

Adapted screenplay

  • “District 9″ (Sony Pictures Releasing) Written by Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell
  • “An Education” (Sony Pictures Classics) Screenplay by Nick Hornby
  • “In the Loop” (IFC Films) Screenplay by Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci, Tony Roche
  • “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” (Lionsgate) Screenplay by Geoffrey Fletcher
  • “Up in the Air” (Paramount in association with Cold Spring Pictures and DW Studios) Screenplay by Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner  XXXXXX!!!!

Original screenplay

  • “The Hurt Locker” (Summit Entertainment) Written by Mark Boal  XXXXXX!!!!
  • “Inglourious Basterds” (The Weinstein Company) Written by Quentin Tarantino
  • “The Messenger” (Oscilloscope Laboratories) Written by Alessandro Camon & Oren Moverman
  • “A Serious Man” (Focus Features) Written by Joel Coen & Ethan Coen
  • “Up” (Walt Disney) Screenplay by Bob Peterson, Pete Docter
    Story by Pete Docter, Bob Peterson, Tom McCarthy
1 Comment more...

Burton in Wonderland

by JT Street on Mar.05, 2010, under JT's movie musings

I got to see “Alice in Wonderland” earlier this week.  I thought it was visually exciting, but irritatingly dismissive of the source material.  To see my full video review, go here.

Now, I believe in giving credit where credit is due, and after being fortunate enough to read David Edelstein’s review of “Alice in Wonderland,” I realized that I had found the perfect review for this movie.  It’s so perfect, in fact, that I’m just going to link to it.

So here. Read and enjoy.  Then go see the movie, leave a comment on my site and let me know what you think.  Or his. Either way.  I know when I’m beaten.

Leave a Comment more...

All Kinds of “Crazy” - How “The Crazies” and “Shutter Island” Avoid Critical Labeling

by JT Street on Mar.02, 2010, under JT's movie musings

When it comes to “scary movies,” critics have a tendency to over-classify.  Scary movie fans have been subjected to this rampant over-classification so often that some can actually articulate the differences between slasher flicks, torture porn, psychological thrillers, monster movies,  monster movie remakes, zombie apocalypses, zombie satires, classic zombie apocalyptic satire remakes, political thrillers, detective stories, ghost stories,  sci-fi horror, B-horror, J-horror, BJ-horror (“Teeth”, anyone?) and vampire romantic dramas (even the sulky teen ones where the thought of actually sitting through the film is far more frightening than the film itself).

With this glut of subgenres (and the ones I named are just the tip of the scary movie iceber…oh! Almost forgot disaster movies!), it’s no surprise that the most appreciated scary films are now the ones that (in addition to being technically sound and visually interesting) attempt to play around with these conventions.  And right now, there are two scary movies in theaters that attempt to execute this genre-bending dance: “Shutter Island” and “The Crazies.”  And while one succeeds more than the other, they each have a lesson to teach about rushing to judge a horror film by it’s poster.

“Shutter Island” initially appears to be a run-of-the-mill detective story: Leo DiCaprio the cop goes to a creepy asylum to track down an escaped inmate. But that’s just a ruse, and as soon as DiCaprio enters the asylum, director Martin Scorsese lets the crazy out, and the ordinary cop drama dissolves into surrealistic blend of psycho-dread, punctuated by moments of escaped-lunatic-terror, with just a pinch of McCarthyism to give it that ‘50s flavor (just like grandma used to make!).

The script chooses character development over cheap thrills and attempts to frighten the intellect with its darkly clinical explorations of the fragility of sanity. And even though it’s based off a book, the movie version of “Shutter Island” manages to feel familiar, yet original… a great example of a master cinematic painter using the color wheel of subgenre to create a haunting work of art that defies easy classification.

“The Crazies” is superficially a photonegative of “Shutter Island.” It’s characters are simplistic small-town horror movie stereotypes: the local lawman and his faithful deputy, the sheriff’s milf-to-be wife and town physician, the all-American-girl with the farmhouse boyfriend, the three hunter hillbillies in the pickup truck…

I think I’ve made my point.

Since the characters are easy to recognize, the movie doesn’t waste any time developing them. That time is instead devoted to packing the “The Crazies” to the brim with one seemingly trite horror movie set piece after another. But what we don’t realize is that director Breck Eisner is just setting us up. The first wave of make-you-jump thrills basically sets the tone, and then, like some classical composer or trip-hop DJ, Eisner starts mixing and remixing the template.

Example: Since “The Crazies” is set in a small rural community, the “there’s someone in the barn!” routine works quite well…so well, in fact, that variations of it are used at least 4 times in the film (5 if you count the truck stop refueling depot as a barn). Now, while this might seem like either a gratuitous lack of creativity or the solution to the world’s worst case of scary movie writer’s block, what it does is create an incredible tension whenever the character enters the structure. Like the bedroom camera setup in “Paranormal Activity,” the audience’s collective sphincter tightens whenever there’s a dimly lit barn in the distance. That gives Eisner maneuverability to either scare with an actual encounter, psych out with a false alarm, or misdirect with a scream from back at the house to continue to build the tension and make the next set piece even more effective.

Add in possessed farmers with pitchforks and shotguns, a couple of drone’s-eye-view shots with cryptic “containment protocol” pop-ups, and a platoon of flame-thrower toting marines with itchy trigger fingers, and you’ve got a bio-terror mind-control big-brother-is-watching jolt-fest that’s part “Dawn of the Dead,” part “Andromeda Strain,” and, most importantly, part “The Crazies” (since this is a remake of a George A. Romero’s “The Crazies” from 1973). All those parts add up to an entertaining movie-going experience, despite cookie-cutter characters and a plot so passé that it seems more like a stage on “Left 4 Dead 2” than a respectable feature film.

Like “Shutter Island,” “The Crazies” attempts to use elements from various subgenres to create a sort of “scary movie blend.” It’s just that Scorsese is an experienced Napa Valley vintner and Eisner is brewing moonshine in a homemade still in the boonies.

Some critics, of course, will view this deconstruction as thoroughly unnecessary and overly academic (which I won’t entirely deny), and label “Shutter Island” a stock psychological thriller and call “The Crazies” a stock zombie or stock “infected” horror film. However, I believe that each movie has a more unique voice than that, and that it is detrimental to ignore that voice in the sake of expediency or laziness (which, as my blog readers know, I am as guilty of as anyone).

By lumping movies into increasingly esoteric subgenres, critics rob films of their unique voices, and in turn, prevent their viewers/readers/listeners from recognizing that uniqueness and evolving their cinematic palates.

And if we critics are arrogant enough to think that this dismissive over-classification is acceptable, then maybe it’s time to initiate those containment protocols.

Leave a Comment more...

“Shutter Island” Is Crazy Good!

by JT Street on Feb.21, 2010, under JT's movie musings

Leonardo DiCaprio is ready to set sail on another Martin Scorsese movie, and they’re off on another quest for Oscar gold!  The first time DiCaprio and Scorsese teamed up, it was in “The Aviator.”  The result: Oscars.  But that wasn’t enough, so the two teamed up again in “The Departed.”  And again:  Oscars.  And now, “Shutter Island,” where DiCaprio plays a ’50s era Boston cop who gets trapped on an island full of award-winning actors.

But before I go any further in this review, I’d just like to tell critics and movie fans to please, please, please, STOP trying to compare every Scorsese movie to “Raging Bull” and “Taxi Driver.”   I know it’s an easy path to take, but comparing every movie that a director makes to his best, most inspired works is pointless and destructive.  It makes you look stupid and ruins the enjoyment of watching movies.  And perhaps most dangerously, looking at movies through that prism means that you are missing out on some quality film-making, because it means that you obviously went into the movie looking for ways that it falls short of the director’s best work (which will then, of course, be there) and it cheapens the movie that you’re reviewing.

Whew!  Now that I got that rant out of the way, on to the review!

As far as psychological thrillers go, it’s hard to beat one that’s set in an asylum.  It’s a great setting to make reality subjective, and really freak out the audience when glasses of water mysteriously disappear then reappear empty, then full again.  Either that, or Scorsese is getting really lax on the continuity front.
The only glaring (or in this case blaring) flaw in “Shutter Island” is the obsequious ominous background music.  The droning, increasingly intense tones are fine when walking down a dark asylum hallway, but they don’t really jive well with a slow drive down a pleasant country road.
I mentioned in the intro that DiCaprio gets trapped on an island full of great actors, and the ensemble really does a great job of selling this film.  Sir Ben Kingsly, Max Von Sydow, Michelle Williams, Patricia Clarkson, Jackie Earle Haley, Mark Ruffalo…I mean, I’d add more but my fingers are starting to cramp!  They all play their roles especially well, but my favorite supporting character in this by far is Max Von Sydow’s slightly German shrink.  He’s confrontational to DiCaprio’s character, but hides it behind a veil of clinical detachment.  Good stuff.
The only glaring (or in this case blaring) flaw in “Shutter Island” is the obsequious ominous background music.  The droning, increasingly intense tones are fine when walking down a dark asylum hallway, but they don’t really jive well with a slow drive down a pleasant country road.
While “Shutter Island” won’t win any Oscars for soundtrack subtlety, there are plenty of nuanced moments, and these optical illusions and delusional dream sequences draw the audience into Scorcese’s madhouse.  And while the subject matter is dark and at times depressing, the thought-provoking and at times joltingly frightening subject matter makes “Shutter Island” a film that will keep you from leaving…except for (thanks to its 2 and a half hour run time) a quick bathroom break.
Leave a Comment more...

Get Your Besson!

by JT Street on Feb.06, 2010, under JT's movie musings

“From Paris With Love” opens up this week.  The film stars John Travolta as a wacky yet kick=ass CIA agent, with Jonathan Rhys Myers as his wormy pencilpushing sidekick.  I know…it sounds bad.  But before you write it off completely, remember that it’s directed by Pierre Morel (Taken, District B13) and co-written by Luc Besson.

To further explain why that means something, I’d like to make a list of 2 of my favorite Besson films and why they keep me from completely losing faith in “From Paris with Love.”

1.  The Fifth Element (1997)

Inventive, exhilirating, and full of memorable catch-phrases, “The Fifth Element” is one of the movies that I most enjoy watching.  Repeat viewings do nothing to diminish the movie’s enjoyment level.  It’s part sci-fi, part buddy comedy, and features some of the quirkiest moments of dark humor of any action flick that I can think of.  I mean, the scene with Gary Oldman selling the weapons to the alien mercenaries…it doesn’t get much better than that.  Besson’s whimsy and sense of humor really shine through in “The Fifth Element,” and I hope that I see that in “From Paris With Love.”

2.  Leon (The Professional) (1995)

Besson creates some of his most complete characters in this violent yet poetic character study.  Jean Reno’s character, Leon, is a professional hitman who loves his job.  Yet the job is so demanding of his personal life that it leads to an incredible loneliness.  Into that loneliness steps Mathilda (Natalie Portman), a runaway who he hides from the goon squad that killed her parents.  The two form an incredible bond, and Besson shows amazing restraint and maturity in his writing, letting his characters make their choices without any judgement or restaint from the writer.

If the qualities that made my favorite Luc Besson movies so memorable made its way into “From Paris With Love,” I didn’t see it in the trailers.  But that kinda thing isn’t exactly trailer-fodder, so it may still be there.  I guess I’ll find out soon enough, won’t I?

Jean Reno

Leave a Comment more...

WWIS: Jan 15-17

by JT Street on Jan.16, 2010, under JT's movie musings

2010 is off to a decapitating start.  In addition to “The Book Of Eli,” there are plenty of other action flicks out there for those who want to get there kill on…which is a rarity in January.  But even if you find bloodletting a little revolting, there are alternatives out there, so let’s take a look at what I would see this weekend.

1.  “The Book of Eli”

Call me a sucker (and you’d be right most of the time to do so), but I can’t help but think that there’s more good than bad in Eli’s good book.  The Movie of Eli has been roundly panned by critics, many of whom dwell on its preachiness and lack of consistency.  But “Avatar” got plenty preachy, and even the best films can be inconsistent if you’re cynically looking for that sort of thing.  So I’m willing to give the Hughes brothers the benefit of the doubt, and give “The Book of Eli” a shot…sight unseen.  Think of it as a leap of faith.

2. “The Lovely Bones”

Peter Jackson’s adaptation of Alice Sebold’s book is another movie that’s been roundly beaten up in critical circles.  I got to see a screener of this film for awards purposes, and I agree with what many of the critics have said about the film… that it’s technically spectacular but wildly manic depressive in tone.  Despite it’s drawbacks, I’d still recommend it to theatergoers this weekend, and, in fact, I am recommending it right now.  “The Lovely Bones” has enough suspense and drama to entertain most moviegoers, and while it does lag at times, it is still a technicolor wonderland that will dazzle viewers… especially those who dig Pink Floyd Laser shows.

3.  Daybreakers

I was skeptical about this movie when it first came out, especially since it’s distributed by the same people who bought “The Spy Next Door.”  But I’ve heard and seen enough about “Daybreakers” (with the exception of actually seeing the movie) to get pretty psyched about eventually dragging myself to the theater to check it out.  Sure, “Daybreakers”  looks like what would happen if you took the scripts from “The Matrix,” “Gattaca,” and “Dracula” and threw them in a random word generator.  But it’s still my number 3 pick this week.

4.  Avatar

I mean, for crying out loud, if you haven’t seen it yet, why the hell are you reading a movie blog?

5.  Youth In Revolt

Maybe too much Michael Cera, but overall, still the funniest looking thing out right now.

That’s it for me this week.  Be sure to check out my Preview Reviews on www.foxsanantonio.com for more movie awesomeness.

1 Comment more...

WWIS?: Dec. 25-27

by JT Street on Dec.27, 2009, under JT's movie musings

With “Sherlock Holmes” and “Avatar” commanding a lot of attention at the box office, it’s time to take a look at what I would recommend seeing to try and shake off that post-holiday boredom.

1. “Sherlock Holmes”

Guy Ritchie toughens up Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s dusty detective, and his casting of Robert Downey Jr. gives Sherlock some much needed swagger.  Add to that a surprisingly non-effete Jude Law as Watson, and you’ve got the baddest crime-fighting duo of the 1800’s!  Ritchie’s CGI Victorian London also adds to “Sherlock Holmes’” character, and his clever shooting style allows him to explain what Holmes is thinking and then show him doing it without boring the audience.  And let’s face it, as much as I like ACD’s stories, their translation to film has been, shall we say, inconsistent.  I highly recommend letting Guy Ritchie’s “Sherlock Holmes” blast you out of your bobby socks.

2. Avatar (in 3D Imax only…seriously, why see it any other way?)

I got the chance to see “Avatar” last week, and all that crap you’ve seen in the trailers and on TV about James Cameron once again reinventing cinema is absolutely, without a doubt, 100 percent true.  The motion capture technology used to imprint the faces of real actors onto the blue bodies of their “avatars” is going to be the new way for directors to use the talents of their actors in computer-generated films for years to come.  That is, as long as those directors have over $300 mil in seed money to get their equipment.  But after grossing over $200 mil in a week and a half, it appears that, unbelievably, James Cameron’s monumental gamble will end up being profitable.   And while its a great movie to watch on the big screen, I have to admit that I actually had more fun watching “Sherlock Holmes.”

3.  Up in the Air

The more I see from other Oscar buzz flicks (Nine, Precious, etc.), the more I’m convinced that “Up in the Air” is going to have a real shot at taking home some heavy hardware.  “Nine” is getting awful reviews, and while “Precious” will be tough competition, I have to think that “Up in the Air” will win that battle.  It’s just a more enjoyable movie to watch…and a much more enjoyable movie for you to spend your money on this week.

4.  Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakwel.

HA!  Almost got ya there, didn’t I?  In all seriousness, after my friend’s 6-year-old daughter ran around our holiday party screaming “Baw-chicka-wah-wah!” because she heard the chipmunks say it, the only people I recommend seeing this “family” film are parents who like to laugh their asses off at kids saying inappropriate things.  …Because that was seriously funny.

As of right now, there’s nothing really new on the docket until “Daybreakers” comes out on Jan. 8th, so it looks like I’ll have a week to catch up on my movie-watching!  Expect a full review of something fun by Friday!  Until then, I’ll see ya at “Sherlock Holmes,” guv’na!

3 Comments more...

What Would I See This Week?

by JT Street on Dec.20, 2009, under JT's movie musings

I know, I know…it’s been a while since I’ve written.  So, to make up for my lapse in concentration (and work ethic), I’ve decided to take this week and list the top four films that I’d go see if I were going to the movies tomorrow:

1. Avatar

Hey, it’s why mvovies are made, right?  Big explosions, lots of crazy chase scenes, all in Imax 3D.  Sure, it’s $16 a ticket, but hey…what’s a few extra dollars when 180-foot tall 3D gunship battles are on the line?  Plus, I haven’t gotten to see it yet (sorry! I really want to!), so that bumps it up a few notches on the ol’ “I’d like to go see this” scale.

2. Red Cliff

How this movie didn’t get a nomination in the “Best Foreign Film” category for the Golden Globes, I’ll never know.  It’s the best thing John Woo has ever done, and it’s one of the most exciting and interesting and beautiful and badass war epics I’ve ever seen.  Go see it on the big screen.  It may not be blue aliens duking it out in 3D, but it sure is worthy of a viewing on the big screen.

3.  Up In The Air

Want to go out on and see a date movie, but keep the relationship expectations realistic?  Then look no further! “Up In The Air” is a great way to entertain a date, while at the same time saying, “let’s keep this thing casual.”  Add to that fantastic performances from the entire cast, and you’ve got an entertaining, funny, and poignant movie that is perfectly in tune with its moment in time.  And even if you don’t drag a date, I’d recommend it, just because it’s always nice to see a movie in the theaters before it takes home a bunch of awards.

4. Invictus

Like “Up In The Air,” it’s a good idea to see “Invictus” in the theaters before awards season.  Morgan Freeman does a great job as Nelson Mandela, and Matt Damon transforms himself into a rugby player so completely that at times I forgot who I was watching.  It’s not easy to upstage Morgan Freeman, but when they’re on screen together, it just feels like Damon did way more homework.  Damon’s performance is the best thing I’ve seen from a supporting actor since Christoph Waltz in “Inglourious Basterds.”  It’s going to be vedy intadestikh (how DO you write a German accent?) to watch those two battle it out come awards season.  It’ll be more interesting for you if you see “Invictus” in the theaters so you can compare the two performances.

So, there’s my list.   You know what?  That was really fun!  So much fun that I’ll give you an updated *holiday* list this weekend, after I’ve seen a couple more movies.  See yah at the theatah!

Leave a Comment more...

“Everybody’s Fine”…But They’re Also Liars.

by JT Street on Dec.04, 2009, under JT's movie musings

I had absolutely no desire to see “Everybody’s Fine” when I saw the trailers.  It looked like a tired, dreadful, played out scenario: Robert De Niro traveling across the country to reunite all his adult children back home for Christmas…to share a dinner together.

Awwww…gag.

I know lots of people like these syrupy holiday flicks, but they’re a little too sweet for my taste.  However, I was delighted in a sad sort of way to find that “Everybody’s Fine” is a much darker, deeper film than the trailers would have you believe.  Death, deceit, regret, estrangement and disappointment are all themes that run deep throughout “Everybody’s Fine,” and the ensemble cast does its best to find the entertaining and heartwarming moments among the heavy story arcs, without devolving into camp or schmaltz.

The resulting film plays out like a psychological character study.  Frank Goode (Robert De Niro) is still adjusting to life after his wife’s death.  His four adult children, Rosie (Drew Barrymore), Amy (Kate Beckinsale), Robert (Sam Rockwell), and David (Austin Lysy), are scattered across the country.  After a long career of spray-coating phone lines, Frank is sick and has been advised not to travel.  But after each of his kids finds an excuse not to come see him on a weekend he had planned (leaving a moping De Niro cooking steaks on a newly-bought grill and chasing them with “expensive” wine…alone), Frank decides to hit the road, armed with a carry-on case, a big bottle of pills, and a handwritten envelope for each child.

As Frank reaches each destination, he learns more about each child and why they didn’t see him that weekend.  In doing so, we learn more about this family…how Frank demanded that his children work hard and succeed, how they in turn grew to hide anything negative from their father and talk more to their mother, and how the family splintered apart after her death.

This conflict between father and children is at the core of “Everybody’s Fine.”  Because of this, it’s critical for the film to have a cast that can handle that conflict in the proper fashion.  There is love in this conflict, and fear.  The children love their father, yet fear disappointing him to the point that they will lie to him.  The father loves his children, yet fears losing them to the point that he will risk his deteriorating health to try and bring them all together.  And yet, the anger and disappointment of a father who is lied to by his children and the anger of those children at being forced to strive for success in the eyes of a father who set the bar impossibly high must also be palpable in each of the characters.

And for the most part, the cast delivers, not that any of them have it easy.  Each child is a grown-up stereotype, left for each actor to flesh out.  Drew Barrymore gets to be a ballerina turned Vegas “dancer,” Sam Rockwell plays the violinist turned Symphony percussionist, and Austin Lysy plays the doodler, grown up to be the troubled, impoverished New York painter.  But it’s Kate Beckinsale that has the hardest job, portraying the successful PR exec with a troubled family life (and who, inexplicably, has no childhood equivalent).  An ensemble cast is only as strong as its weakest link, and though I’ve had plenty of fun ragging on Beckinsale in the past (Whiteout, Underworld franchise, Val Helsing, etc.), she manages not to draw any negative attention to herself.

But really, this is Robert De Niro’s movie, and its success or failure relies on his talent.  De Niro tries admirably to play against type, and succeeds in giving us some genuine moments of warmth and vulnerability. But he is such a strong character and has been so menacing and powerful for so long that its hard for the audience to accept this new incarnation.  When De Niro tells his grandson, “You like making fun of me, eh?  You think I’m funny?”, its hard not to see De Niro with a baseball bat bashing in the heads of those who disrespected him.  This is not De Niro’s fault, per se, but it does make his task all the more difficult.

In the end, though, all the pieces fall into place.  De Niro finds his rhythm, and the accompanying cast supports him well.  The plot avoids histrionics for the most part and moves logically towards its bittersweet conclusion.  And while there are questions that I have about the script that I can’t divulge without giving away major spoilers, the film as a whole is structurally sound and directed without unnecessary flourish.  It’s an honest, well put together film that doesn’t condescend to its audience.  It may not win any awards this year, but it sure is better than another “Miracle on 34th Street” remake.

Leave a Comment more...

Ninja Assassin! Kill! Kill!

by JT Street on Nov.25, 2009, under JT's movie musings

Did you watch “Kill Bill Vol. 1″ and say “Where’s the blood?”  Did you think “Punisher: War Zone” was too plot-heavy?  Did you like “Sin City,” except for all those bright colors?  If so, then you’ll love “Ninja Assassin!”

Yes, if you like ninjas, assassins, and redundancy, then “Ninja Assassin” is the movie for you.  “V for Vendetta” director James McTeigue pulls out all the stops and turns off all the lights, allowing shadowy ninjas to materialize out of the tiniest corners of darkness at every turn.  These appearing acts are really fun to watch, and they create some spooky moments that will make you want to turn on all your lights when you get back home from the theater.

Unfortunately, those exciting moments of ninja-lore are drowned out in a sea of CG blood that comes gushing out of slit throats, severed limbs, and hacked torsos, which would be totally cool if we could actually see who was doing the slashing.  But most of the big fight scenes happen at night or in buildings where the power had been shut off by those crafty ninjas.  And while poor lighting is a good strategy for ninja fighting, it does make it hard for the audience to follow along, or even appreciate the effort of Korean pop star Rain’s work as ninja badass Raizo.  Rain does a serviceable job with his spoken lines, and even gets a good intentional laugh or two with his camerawork (a security guard who sees the pop star on tape says he looks more like a singer in a boy band than a killing machine, which is good for a chuckle even if you didn’t know who he was).

But ninja movies aren’t about acting.  They’re about ass-kicking, and that’s where Rain is at his best.  Rain’s grace and physical prowess as a dancer translates very well to the martial arts world, giving his moves a fluidity that makes them believable.  Watching the film, I immediately accepted that this guy had spent his whole life learning to fight.  Of course, I may have just believed it because the movie spends the first hour flashing back between present day Raizo’s fight against the Ozunu clan who raised him and his childhood trials and tribulations that eventually forced him to flee said “family.”

When “Ninja Assassin” isn’t explaining what a good person Raizo is, it’s trying to sell us some cop drama angle that’s as lame as it is unnecessary.  Naomie Harris and Ben Miles play a pair of “Europol” agents snooping around into the clan’s history of assassinations.  This part of the film never really meshes with the “clan betrayal” story, even when Rain and Harris join forces.  It feels like two separate bad movies are trying to be crammed together.  The end result is a clumsy, jumbled mess of bad story and character cliches, interrupted by hard to follow action scenes that masquerade as “stylized” by hiding behind poor lighting and excessive gore.

It seems like McTeigue believes that if he just makes the fight scenes flashy and gory enough, the audience will forget the rest.  And for the most part, we did.  I had a great time watching “Ninja Assassin” in a packed theater, laughing with my fellow audience with each decapitation.  It wasn’t until later on, when my bloodlust faded and my critic-brain turned back on, that I realized that I’d been duped.  Ninjas are masters of deception, and McTeigue wraps a black t-shirt around his head and tries tricking you into believing that what he’s doing is edgy or artsy or inspired.  But it’s actually just a hodge-podge of recycled plot lines and clumsy fight scenes hidden behind special effects wizardry and a cool soundtrack.

No wonder the Wachowski brothers wanted to produce it!  As always, leave your comments below.  And I’ll leave the lights on for you.

Leave a Comment :, , , , , more...

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...